Criteria D-(Pear evaluation)

Peer Evaluation

Danae-Her work was about stop motion animation. Her presentation was clear and neat. Also it was fluent and I could see that she put a lot of efforts on her work, but she needs to make her video a bit more clearer.

Dannah - Her work was about Google virtual reality viewer. She made her presentation really organized and neat. Her informations were clear and easy to understand

Jaeu & Levi-Their work was bamboo speaker. Their presentation were good, but they need more details about their work and better quality for their video.

Salin- She needs a lot more efforts on her work and she need more confidence while she was presenting.

Selahattin, George and Salah- Their work was Camera using raspberry pi. Their presentation were not bad, but they need more

Adam, saad and ryan- Their work was rc lego car.They need a lot of effort on their work. They need to bring their demonstration and decoration.

Marta and Danae- Their presentation were great. It had a lot of picture and  information which made me understand better.